atlantafasad.blogg.se

Why is act of war direct action listed on nat gaming
Why is act of war direct action listed on nat gaming






why is act of war direct action listed on nat gaming

Madeleine Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." "As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." "We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb. "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."

why is act of war direct action listed on nat gaming

For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." "Iraq is a long way from, but what happens there matters a great deal here. Neither the United States nor the global community can afford to allow Saddam Hussein to continue on this path." As long as UNSCOM is prevented from carrying out its mission, the effort to monitor Iraqi compliance with Resolution 687 becomes a dangerous shell game.

why is act of war direct action listed on nat gaming

"It is essential that a dictator like Saddam not be allowed to evade international strictures and wield frightening weapons of mass destruction. At issue is nothing less than the fundamental question of whether or not we can keep the most lethal weapons known to mankind out of the hands of an unreconstructed tyrant and aggressor who is in the same league as the most brutal dictators of this century." "Fateful decisions will be made in the days and weeks ahead. Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade, and much of his nation's wealth, not on providing for the Iraqi people, but on developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them." "Together we must also confront the new hazards of chemical and biological weapons, and the outlaw states, terrorists and organized criminals seeking to acquire them. "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.








Why is act of war direct action listed on nat gaming